US Voter Fraud Case On Its Way To The Supreme Court: President Trump’s campaign is quickly moving up their case against potential voter fraud in Pennsylvania.
On Sunday, the campaign’s legal team, which is headed by attorney Rudy Giuliani, submitted an appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
The move came less than a day after Pennsylvania District Judge Matthew Brann dismissed the case.
Giuliani and his team have been working tirelessly to bring forth evidence of more than 600,000 illegally cast ballots.
“The reason for the application and the reason to keep all these things together is precisely to avoid what the Democrats did in this election, which is to misuse the absentee ballot process and the mail-in ballot process in order to cheat,” stated the Trump attorney.
RELATED: Americans Fleeing To Caribbean Fearing Outcome Of US Elections
District Judge Brann ruled that the Trump campaign didn’t have enough evidence to overturn the election results.
However, both President Trump and his legal team said they were not allowed to produce witnesses or evidence to the court.
The campaign stated they had 50 witnesses ready to testify who claim to have seen election officials disobey a law guaranteeing independent review of the ballots.
“This pattern repeats itself in a number of states, almost exactly the same pattern, which to any experienced investigator prosecutor would suggest that there was a plan from a centralized place to execute these various acts of voter fraud,” Giuliani explained.
Although disagreeing with the opinion, Giuliani commended Brann for making a swift decision. He pointed out it expedites the case to the Supreme Court.
The attorney said he hopes the appellate court will rule quickly. The campaign is optimistic their case will make its way to the nation’s highest court.
16 Post-Election Legal Challenges in 4 States
The reelection campaign of President Donald Trump and a handful of Republican groups are litigating more than a dozen active post-election cases in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, and Nevada as of Nov. 23, with some of the cases already moving up the judicial pyramid.
The plaintiffs are racing against time with just over two weeks left until the safe-harbor deadline on Dec. 8, when the states are supposed to have resolved all disputes and settled the vote counts.
The legal pathways toward altering the election outcome will narrow significantly after the safe-harbor marker, given that the Supreme Court ended one post-election dispute in Florida in 2000 because it wasn’t completed by that deadline.
An Arizona judge dismissed the last post-election legal challenge by Republicans in the state last week.
The Grand Canyon state’s recount law doesn’t allow aggrieved parties to request recounts and the campaign fell two-tenths of a percentage point short of the margin needed for an automatic audit. The state’s deadline for certifying the election results is Nov. 30.
Likewise, Republicans have no election lawsuits pending in Wisconsin, where a recount of the presidential election is ongoing in two counties.
The Badger State is scheduled to certify its election results on Dec. 1, a day after Arizona. A recount is also pending in Georgia.
With 79 electoral votes between them, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada will likely decide the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
The Epoch Times will not call a winner until members of the House and Senate—between Jan. 6 and Jan. 20—count the electoral votes and pick the president.
Enough votes are at stake in the lawsuits in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia to alter the outcome of the election, but only if the courts in each state deny former Vice President Joe Biden the victory he unofficially claimed earlier this month.
Biden is the projected winner in all six states and Trump has a substantial legal hurdle to clear to defy the projections, even if the recounts in Wisconsin and Georgia reverse the unofficial outcomes.
The president’s election legal team has nonetheless projected confidence that the court challenges will result in an ultimate victory for Trump.
Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, the lead attorney on the team, said at a press conference last week that the battle ahead is about more than overturning the projected results.
“We are confident that through these multiple pathways to victory, we will get to the actual outcome that the evidence shows,” Giuliani said, after alleging a number of types of election malfeasance and widespread voter fraud.
“This is not about overturning an election on our part, it’s about making sure that we protect and preserve free and fair elections for all future American elections,” he said.
“If the United States caves to corruption or this type of election integrity disaster, then no election will be secure from here on out, and we all need to be keenly aware of that.”
Legal scholar Alan Dershowitz, who represented the president during the impeachment trial but is not part of the election effort, was less confident about the outcome.
“I think that President Trump is running out of legal challenges,” Dershowitz told The Epoch Times.
“He may have the law on his side in Pennsylvania and maybe some other states, but he doesn’t have the numbers, or the evidence, at this point in time.
The margin of victory in Pennsylvania seems to exceed the number of challenged votes, and the evidence of computer glitches or tampering—I haven’t seen it yet.”
